trouble me the bourdon

Tuesday 28 April 2015

Medieval dance

Some readers (those few of you) may have heard the BBC3 'Early Music Show' on Sunday, featuring 'Medieval Dance' (if not, you should be able to listen via that link, for the next month at least). Though it had some good points - not least a very valiant attempt by the guest dance expert Darren Royston to communicate dance via radio - and the inclusion of our very own recording of Rostibolli - it was a little frustrating as well, particularly in making no attempt at a distinction between 'medieval' and 'renaissance' dance.

For example it included everything from a completely made-up dance to the 13th century song 'Sumer is icumen in', via the 15th century Italian repertoire, to 16th century Arbeau branles, without really explaining the important differences. These include level of the evidence available for reconstruction (from 'make a guess from pictures', to 'choreographies but not explanations of the steps', to 'which foot to move where on each beat of the music'), but also big musical changes. In fact I have just noticed that the BBC website listing of the music played describes 'Dance de Cleves' and 'Washerwoman's Branle' as 'French 14th century' when they date from the late 15th and late 16th century respectively; and the 15th century Italian dances Rostibolli and Gelosia are also listed as '14th century'.

Given it is the 'Early Music' show it was also a pity there was no discussion of what is known about the instrumental ensembles that played for dancing. The programme included discussion of the Gresley manuscript which was nice, but then used as an example the dance 'Rawty' for which there is no actual music in the manuscript (the version played in the programme comes from the recent York Waits disk and was composed by them).

As so often seems to happen with early music, 'medieval' seemed to be shorthand for 'let's have some jolly fun' rather than seriously engaging with what is known about the repertoire.I somehow doubt they would accept such inaccuracies if making a programme about Baroque dance.

1 comment:

  1. As Cait said, Darren Royston did a good job trying to communicate dance, and seemed a good teacher, but why the hell did they get a man who told me personally he was not particularly knowledgeable about 15th (or 16th C) dance, to be the 'expert' on medieval and renaissance dance?

    As for misattributing a batch of pieces by two centuries, that is just plain sloppy and shows the contempt that that the 'Classical Music' world has for anything pre-early (pre-1500) unless it is sung by a cathedral choir, or subset.

    I know the Early Music Show has never been a flagship for anything like scholarship but somebody at the BBC should be better at researching.

    ReplyDelete